Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

Amen, quippe dico vobis, donec tránseat cœlum et terra, iota unum aut unus apex non præteríbit a lege, donec ómnia fiant.

Amen dico vobis quia unus vestrum me traditurus est | Europeana

Evangelium Matt 5:13-19
In illo témpore: Dixit Iesus discípulis suis: Vos estis sal terræ. Quod si sal evanúerit, in quo saliétur? Ad níhilum valet ultra, nisi ut mittátur foras, et conculcétur ab homínibus. Vos estis lux mundi. Non potest cívitas abscóndi supra montem pósita. Neque accéndunt lucérnam, et ponunt eam sub módio, sed super candelábrum, ut lúceat ómnibus qui in domo sunt. Sic lúceat lux vestra coram homínibus, ut vídeant ópera vestra bona, et gloríficent Patrem vestrum, qui in cœlis est. Nolíte putáre, quóniam veni sólvere legem aut prophétas: non veni sólvere, sed adimplére. Amen, quippe dico vobis, donec tránseat cœlum et terra, iota unum aut unus apex non præteríbit a lege, donec ómnia fiant. Qui ergo solvent unum de mandátis istis mínimis, et docúerit sic hómines, mínimus vocábitur in regno cœlórum: qui autem fécerit et docúerit, hic magnus vocábitur in regno cœlórum.

OMELIA DI DON ENRICO RONCAGLIA

Gesu’ ci dice che non e’ venuto per abolire, ma per completare. Occorre guardarsi quindi da certi insegnamenti “semplificati” del giorno d’oggi.

Questo vale anche per la storia della chiesa. Le cose in segnate in passato sono ancora valide. Un esempio memorabile e’ San Lorenzo da Brindisi, cappuccino, predicatore e teologo, dottore della Chiesa. Famoso per la sua spiritualita’ , la sua cultura teologica, e per il suo impegno di diffusione della fede contro le eresie protestanti.

Il nostro impegno possa seguire e segua il suo esempio!

Sia lodato Gesu Cristo!

HOMILY BY DON ENRICO RONCAGLIA

Jesus tells us that he did not come to abolish, but to complete. It is therefore necessary to beware of certain “simplified” teachings of today.

This also applies to the history of the church. Things of the past are still valid. A memorable example is San Lorenzo of Brindisi, a Capuchin, preacher and theologian, doctor of the Church. Famous for his spirituality, his theological culture, and for his commitment to spreading the faith against Protestant heresies.

Our commitment may follow his example!

Praised be Jesus Christ!

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

Tu vero vígila, in ómnibus labóra, opus fac Evangelístæ, ministérium tuum ímple.

Léctio Epístolæ beáti Pauli Apóstoli ad Timothéum
2 Tim 4:1-8
Caríssime: Testíficor coram Deo, et Iesu Christo, qui iudicatúrus est vivos et mórtuos, per advéntum ipsíus et regnum eius: prǽdica verbum, insta opportúne, importune: árgue, óbsecra, íncrepa in omni patiéntia, et doctrína. Erit enim tempus, cum sanam doctrínam non sustinébunt, sed ad sua desidéria, coacervábunt sibi magistros, pruriéntes áuribus, et a veritáte quidem audítum avértent, ad fábulas autem converténtur. Tu vero vígila, in ómnibus labóra, opus fac Evangelístæ, ministérium tuum ímple. Sóbrius esto. Ego enim iam delíbor, et tempus resolutiónis meæ instat. Bonum certámen certávi, cursum consummávi, fidem servávi. In réliquo repósita est mihi coróna iustítiæ, quam reddet mihi Dóminus in illa die, iustus iudex: non solum autem mihi, sed et iis, qui díligunt advéntum eius.

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

THE PROPHECY OF THE HERETIC POPE: From the Catechism of the Catholic Church (pp. 675-676)

 

“Before the coming of Christ, the Church must go through a final test that will shake the faith of many believers.

The persecution that accompanies his pilgrimage to earth will reveal the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception that offers men an apparent solution to their problems, at the price of apostasy from the truth.

The greatest religious imposture is that of the Anti-Christ, that is, of a pseudo-messianism in which man glorifies himself in the place of God and his Messiah who came in the flesh.

This anti-Christ imposture is already outlined in the world whenever one claims to realize in history the messianic hope that cannot be fulfilled if not beyond it, through eschatological judgment; even under its mitigated form, the Church has rejected this falsification of the future kingdom under the name of millennialism, especially under the political form of an “intrinsically perverse” secularized messianism.

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

LA PROFEZIA DEMONIACA SULLA DITTATURA MONDIALE VAX-JAB

(Di Padre Giulio Maria Scozzaro (*))

La lettura migliorerà la Fede di ognuno e vi spingerà a pregare di più e con grande fiducia il nostro amatissimo Padre del Cielo. Questo esorcismo lo considero autentico non solo perché nelle risposte dei diavoli avverto che sono proprio loro a parlare, tutto quello che dicono è veritiero. I diavoli con queste rivelazioni fanno qualcosa che va pienamente contro i loro interessi, cioè svelano piani e strategie per distruggere la Chiesa e l’umanità. Se non fossero costretti a parlare nell’esorcismo non rivelerebbero mai tutte queste rivelazioni sul loro immondo operato. (1)

Esorcista :

In nome di san Pio e delle sue stimmate, ti ordino di continuare e far conoscere ai figli di Dio la verità su ciò che stai nascostamente preparando….

Demonio :

Noooooo! Quel barbone nooooooo!!!! Non lo voglio!!!! Vi ho messo in corpo una paura che vi rende disperati, non sapete dove volgere lo sguardo. Grazie ai miei servi sto ingannando molti, facendo credere che una volta inoculato il vaccino tutto finirà. Ahahahaha! Illusi e limitati. La dittatura è solo all’inizio… a breve mobiliteremo i nostri infiltrati e ridurremo l’umanità a poco più di un miliardo di poveri esseri. Il ricatto dell’obbligo vaccinale inoculato nei vostri organi vitali, mediante un veleno mortifero, capace di cambiare per sempre l’identità di voi animali di terra, in grado di ricostruire il vostro patrimonio genetico, fatto con feti abortiti, è una nostra iniziativa, deve servire per piegarvi e farvi accettare il mio dominio sulla terra, il regno del terrore che voglio instaurare. Tutti dovranno adorarmi e chi non lo vorrà fare sarà perseguitato, incarcerato, martirizzato. Saranno costruiti campi appositi dove metterci tutti quei pazzi che vorranno seguire quello che ho ucciso sulla croce. Altri martiri! Altro sangue innocente! Ma che importa! io vi odiooooo!!!!
Non sfuggiranno al mio progetto sterminatore. Ma, al tempo stesso, devo dirvi, senti che tuono terribile dall’Alto, che chi si affida totalmente nelle mani di Quella là, la prega con quell’arnese maledetto, recitando il rosario intero, sarà protetto sotto il suo manto. Nulla mancherà ai suoi figli. Contro chi è consacrato a Lei nulla possiamo fare. Nienteeeeeee!!!!!!!!!
!

___________________

(*) https://ilbenevincera.wordpress.com/tag/padre-giulio-maria-scozzaro/

(1) L’ ESORCISMO PIÙ IMPORTANTE DELLA STORIA. SATANA RIVELA TUTTA LA VERITÀ.

https://www.proselitismodellascienza.it/2021/01/31/l-esorcismo-piu-importante-della-storia-satana-rivela-tutta-la-verita/

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

SULLA POSSIBILE CONVERSIONE DEI PRO-BERGOGLIANI

Non credo sia facile convertire i seguaci della falsa chiesa, anche perche’ molti di questi ci vivono sopra e sono quindi prezzolati (si, ricevono soldi per farlo!).

COSA NE PENSATE VOI?

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

QUESTA E’ TROPPO GROSSA! THIS IS TOO BIG!

Scusate ma questa devo raccontarvela: e’ troppo grossa!

E’ l’ultima (e disperata) giustificazione dei pro-bergogliani!

L’episodio di pachamama in vaticano del 4 ottobre 2019 non sarebbe idolatria…

perche’ si tratta di una semplice statuetta” (sic!).

Questi sono arrivati alla disperazione assoluta (la canna del gas)!

Santa giornata a tutti!

IL SEGNO DELLA CROCE BLASFEMO!

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

Catena di preghiera del Piccolo Resto – 21 luglio

Oggi mercoledì 21 luglio, dalle ore 5.54 alle ore 6.46: Rosario del Dolore, Consacrazione e Adorazione del Preziosissimo Sangue, Adorazione del Sacro Capo di Gesu’ e Litaniae Lauretanae.

Per la Catena di Preghiera del Piccolo Resto e la Crociata di Preghiera della Vergine della Rivelazione. O BVM aiutaci ed ispiraci affinché ci lasciamo guidare da te nella preghiera e nella battaglia quotidiana.

Tu ci aiuti infatti durante la preghiera suggerendoci le idee (grazie!).

Grazie soprattutto a te Gesu’ che per ispiraci allo spirito di concordia e di riconciliazione.

Grazie anche alla nostra BVM per il suo prezioso aiuto per la conversione difficile degli atei, dei seguaci della falsa chiesa, confusi dal fumo di satana (stanno costruendo un castello di regole e proibizioni manifestamente sataniche) e dei non cristiani.

Aiutaci Maria, Nostra Madre, a sconfiggere il male con la preghiera!

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

IL PAPA E’ ERETICO: chi e quando l’ha per primo dichiarato tale?

Let’s put the record straight: who first declared that “the pope is heretic”?

On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostolica Series making those letters magisterial documents.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

IL PAPA E’ ERETICO: COSA DEVE SUCCEDERE

1) “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

2) “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

3) LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Categorie
LA RICERCA DELLA VERA FEDE - THE SEARCH OF TRUE FAITH

San Roberto Bellarmino sul “PAPA ERETICO”

Saint Robert Bellarmine (1), also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”

SOURCE: (1) https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt

FIRST PART: ROBERT BELLARMINE’S STATEMENTS

The Five Opinions Dealing with the Hypothesis of a Pope Heretic 
Expounded by Saint Robert Bellarmine 


In the analysis of the divers opinions of the theologians over the hypothesis of the Pope heretic, 
we will adopt the classification presented by Saint Robert Bellarmine. Even today this is entirely valid 
in as much as the studies about the matter have made practically no progress in the last centuries. For 
this reason, many recent authors order the matter following in the footsteps of the great doctor of the 
Counter- Reform (1). When, nevertheless, it appears to us that the division of St. Robert Bellarmine does 
not distinguish with precision all the nuances which characterize certain schools, we will suggest sub- 
divisions within his classification. 

He enumerates five opinions worthy of study (2): 

1 - the Pope can not be a heretic; 

2 - falling into heresy, even merely internal, the Pope ipso facto loses the Pontificate; 

3 - even though he falls into heresy, the Pope does not lose his charge; 

4 - the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church; 

5 - the Pope heretic is ipso facto deposed in the moment in which his heresy becomes manifest. 

In establishing this classification, Saint Robert Bellarmine only sought to order the matter in a 
manner convenient for the exposition of the reasons and objections which can be alleged in relation to 
each opinion. It was not his purpose to make a complete and systematic presentation of the principal 
positions which have been taken, in the course of the centuries, over the theological hypothesis of a 
Pope heretic. He does not refer, for example, to the doctrine of conciliarism, which had enormous 
importance in the past, and which, although of condemned by the Church, (3) is sprouting up again in 
numerous progressive writings. The great Jesuit Saint did not set out clearly the logical criteria 
according to which he ordered the matter. All this creates a certain difficulty 


(1) See, for example: Wernz-Vidal , lus Cart., tom. II, pp. 433 ff.; Cocchi , Comment, in Codicem..., vol. Ill, p. 25- 
26; Reqatillo . Inst. Juris Canonici, vol. I, p. 299. 

Others adopt the classification of Saint Robert Bellarmine, but they introduce small alterations into it: Bouix , 
Tract de Papa, tom. II, pp. 654 ft.; Sipos , Ench. luris Can., p. 156, item d. 

(2) De Romano Pontifice, lib. II, cap. XXX. - We will not consider, here, observations which Saint Robert 
Bellarmine makes about this matter in other passages of his writings. 

(3) See Denz.-Sch., systematic index, item G4db. 

SECOND PART: DIVERSE OPINIONS STATED ON BELLARMINO STATEMENTS

POSITION OF EACH OPINION 
IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF 
ST. ROBERT BELLARMINE (*) 

OBSERVATIONS 

PRINCIPAL 

DEFENDERS 

INDEX (pages of this 
work in which each 
opinion is studied) 

A - The Pope cannot fall into heresy 

FIRST OPINION in the 
Classification of Saint 
Robert Bellarmine 

In the exposition of this opinion, we subdivide 
its followers into three groups (pp. 147-148): 

1 . Authors according to whom this opinion con- 
stitutes a truth of faith (Matthaeucci); 

2. authors according to whom this opinion is by 
far the most probable (Card. Billot); 

3. authors according to whom this opinion ap- 
pears to be only more probable that the oth- 
ers (Saint Robert Bellarmine, Suarez). 

St. Robert Bellarmine 

(**) 

Suarez (**) 
Matthaeucci 
Bouix (**) 

Billot (**) 

Chapter about this op- 
inion (146-155); 
Card.Billot (146-147); 
Suarez (147,154-155); 
St.R.Bellarmine( 155); 
Salaverri(155); refut- 
ation based on Script- 
ure and Tradition 
(148-153); we do not 
follow this opinion 
(172 ff.) 

B - Theologically one cannot exclude 
the hypothesis of a Pope heretic 

Stated by Saint Robert 
Bellarmine on saying that 
the first opinion is not 
certain 


See the following 
items (***) 

Explanation by refer- 
ences (p. 156) 

I - By reason of his heresy, the 
Pope never loses the Pontif- 
icate 

THIRD OPINION of the 
classification of Saint 
Robert Bellarmine 

Of the 136 authors whose positions on the hypo- 
thesis of a Pope heretic we examined, the only 
defender of this opinion is Bouix. 

Bouix (**) 

Chapter on this opin- 
ion (158-160); we do 
not follow this opin- 
ion (172 ff.) 

II - The Pope heretic loses the Pon- 
tificate 

Expounded by Saint Robert 
Bellarmine together with 
the fourth opinion 


See the following 
items (***) 

Saint Robert Bellar- 
mine (169 ff.); object- 
ions Bouix (158 ff.); 
we follow this opin- 
ion (172) 

1) He loses the Pontificate in 
the very moment in which he 
falls into internal heresy, 
that is, before manifesting 
it externally 

SECOND OPINION of the 
classification of Saint 
Robert Bellarmine 

Opinion abandoned by the theologians today. 

Torquemada 

Chapter on this opin- 
ion (156-157); an 
abandoned opinion 
(157) 

2) He loses the Pontificate 
when his heresy turns 
manifest 

FIFTH OPINION of the 
classification of Saint 
Robert Bellarmine 

In expounding this opinion we subdivide those who 
follow it into three groups (pp. 170-171): 

1 . Authors who understand by “manifest” a heresy 
merely exteriorized; 

2. Authors who understand by “manifest” a heresy 
which, in addition to being exteriorized, has 
come to the knowledge of others; 

3. Authors who understand by “manifest” a heresy 
which becomes notorious and publicly divulged 
(Wernz-Vidal). 

Some authors do not make entirely clear to which 
of these three schools they affiliate themselves 
(Saint Robert Bellarmine, p. 171). 

St. Robert Bellarmine 

(**) 

Billot (**) 

Cano 

Chapter on this opin- 
ion (168-171); Saint 
Robert Bellarmine 
(168-169); Pietro Bal- 
lerini (169-170); sub- 
division (170-171); 
evaluation (171); we 
follow this opinion, 
embracing the subdiv- 
ision n. 3 (172-176) 

3) He loses the Pontificate only 
upon the declaration of his 
heresy by a council, by the 
Cardinals, by groups of Bishops, 
etc. 

Expounded by Saint Robert 
Bellarmine together with 
the fourth opinion 


See the following 
items (***) 

Exposition and refut- 
ation by Saint Robert 
Bellarmine (164-167); 
we do not follow this 
opinion (175) 

a) This declaration would be 
a deposition properly so 
called 

Saint Robert Bellarmine 
does not list this opin- 
ion, because it is here- 
tical 

Under the form of neo-conciliarism, this opinion 
is sprouting up in numerous progressive writings. 

Conciliarists: 
Gerson, Pierre 
D’Ailly, etc. 

Opinion condemned 
by the Church (161, 
note 1); neo-concil- 
iarism (161, note 3) 

b) This declaration would not be 
a deposition properly so 
called, but a mere act de- 
claring the loss of the Pon- 
tificate by the Pope heretic 

FOURTH OPINION in the 
classification of Saint 
Robert Bellarmine 

As to who ought to make this declaration, see 
the passage of Suarez which we cite on pp. 163-164. 

Cajetan 
Suarez (**) 

Chapter on this opin- 
ion (161-167); Suarez 
(161-164); refutation 
by Saint Robert Bell- 
armine (164-167); we 
do not follow this 
opinion (175) 


(*) As we have already noted, we refer here only to the classification presented by Saint Robert Bellarmine in De Romano Pontifice, lib. II, 
cap. XXX. 

(**) The authors marked by two asterisks judge it more probable that a Pope could not fall into heresy, but do not consider this position to be 
certain. For this reason, they analyse the possibility of a Pope who would become a heretic and they take a position concerning the problem 
of his eventual lose of the Pontificate. Therefore, do not find it strange, that the names of these authors appear two times in the column 
“principal defenders” of the different opinions: among those who follow the thesis that the Pope will never fall into heresy (first opinion of the 
classification of Saint Robert Bellarmine), and among those who make pronouncements concerning the lose of the Pontificate by a heretic 
Pope (according to the fifth opinion of the classification of Saint Robert Bellarmine). Concerning this subject, see pp. 154-155. 

(***) In view of the criteria adopted for the enunciation of the “divers opinions”, it becomes clear that position B, B-ll, and B-ll-3 constitute 
generic opinions, which become more specific from what follows immediately after. This being so, we de not indicate the “principal 
defenders”, who are obviously those of the opinions that follow. 

__________________________